Neil
Thielke -- October, 2006
While
reading Wayne Grudem's book, Christian
Beliefs, I was galled by Grudem’s avocation that God
purposefully made most of the people in His historical plan appointed (chosen/
elected/ preplanned) before creation by Him for hell. (One person called
this "elected reprobation".) Most of Grudem's material is great,
but then comes the poison pill of his definition of "election".
Grudem articulates the Calvinist position very accurately. He says “People who remain in unbelief do so
because they are unwilling to come to God, and the blame for such unbelief
always lies with themselves, never with God” (p. 84). On the other hand he
solidly defends the idea that “God chooses some to be saved and passes over
others, deciding not to save them” (p. 84). Because of the glaring
contradiction, Grudem goes on to say, “Once again, we probably will not be able
to fully understand in this age just how this can be so” (p. 84). Calling
Calvin the “greatest theologian of the reformation” (p. 149), Grudem identifies
himself with calvinistic interpretation of scripture (p. 13 of Grudem’s book Bible Doctrine).
While
I appreciate that Grudem is not trumpeting the virtues of Calvin throughout his
book, there are many others who proudly proclaim themselves “calvinist” defying
the exhortation of Paul in I Corinthians 3. We could substitute the names
of Luther and Calvin for those of Cephas & Apollos:
10I appeal to you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree with one another so that there may be no divisions among you and that you may be perfectly united in mind and thought.11My brothers, some from Chloe's household have informed me that there are quarrels among you.12What I mean is this: One of you says, "I follow Paul"; another, "I follow Apollos"; another, "I follow Cephas"; still another, "I follow Christ."
13Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you? Were you baptized into the name of Paul?
(1 Cor. 1:10-13, NIV)
I
escaped the quagmire of the reformers when I came to Christ only to be
faced with the whole issue all over again by "Bible believing"
co-workers who steep themselves in the reformer’s material, searching for
“systematic truth”. (The epitome of this for me was a Jewish teacher
expounding on the virtues of Martin Luther. The irony is that Martin
Luther is the reformer who advocated that all unconverted Jews, those
who choose not to become Lutheran, should be mercilessly persecuted and killed.)
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/luther-jews.html
Likewise,
Jean Calvin ran his own Kingdom on earth at
May
the Lord protect us from the travesty of such a definition of God’s kingdom as
Calvin and Luther expressed. Conversely, the Kingdom that Jesus promoted was
not of this world:
Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place." (John 18:36, NIV)
14After the people saw the miraculous sign that Jesus did, they began to say, "Surely this is the Prophet who is to come into the world."15Jesus, knowing that they intended to come and make him king by force, withdrew again to a mountain by himself. (John 6:14-15, NIV)
Neither
Luther nor Calvin moved to totally embrace the scriptures as their guide but
clung to the clergy-laity separation of the Old Testament from which the Catholics
largely drew their model. Nor did they take up the need for restoration of
believer’s baptism (the first act of obedience of a born-again believer),
continuing instead to base their doctrine on Old Testament circumcism expressed
in an infant sprinkling act. Their reformation was marginal at best.
Jan
Comenius (1592- 1670) wrote of those in the Catholic tradition in the middle
ages- of which both Calvin and Luther were extensions as “partial reformers”:
“Out of the Bible they forge their different creeds; these are bulwarks
behind which they entrench themselves and resist all attacks… In divine service
the words of men are usually heard more than the Word of God… What can help?
Only the one thing needful: return to Christ, looking to Christ as the only
Leader, and walking in his footsteps, setting aside all other ways until we all
reach the goal, and have come to the unity of faith (Ephesians 4:13). As
the Heavenly Master built everything on the ground of the scriptures, so should
we leave all particularities of our special confessions and be satisfied with
the revealed Word of God which belongs to us all.” (The Pilgrim Church by Edmund Broadbent, pp. 157- 158)
E.
H. Broadbent’s book The Pilgrim Church
traces the historical pathway of those who chose the scriptures as their guide
rather than the Catholic Church or its reformers. It provides a “systematic”
study of those who were not followers of men but rather followers of the Word
of God- as much as they were able to.
Let
us return back to the scriptures in totality for our reference point and
identity. Let us distance ourselves from the reformers whose doctrines
and practices supplant the place of the Word of God’s centrality in our midst.
Henceforth let us know the reformers, not only by their doctrine, but
also by their fruit: the terrors, intolerance, and tortures for which they and
their followers were known in their day. Jesus said,
16“By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?17Likewise every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.18A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit.19Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.” (Matthew 7:16-20, NIV)
And
concerning the non-election of those who refuse Christ, Let us continue to
bring the Word of God and His hope to everyone, for the Bible does not say
“Everyone who has been predestined for hell by God will go to hell”, and “he
blesses all who are predestined”. Neither does it say that “those who are
predestined by God will never be put to shame” but what does it say?
10For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you confess and are saved.11As the Scripture says, "Anyone who trusts in him will never be put to shame."12For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile--the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him,13for, "Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved." (Romans 10:10-13, NIV. Bold added by author for emphasis)Furthermore the scriptures did not say that “Christ died for the sins of the predestined” but
He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world. (1 John 2:2, NIV. Bold added by author)
Luther’s
call for “sola scriptura” is an exhortation to embrace a journey that has not
yet been completed by either his or Calvin’s followers. While I personally
respect Grudem (he has a great article on Christians and their involvement in
the political election linked to his personal web page) and others who hold to
the calvinistic tradition (some are my dear friends), at the same time, a call
to distance ourselves from the reformers’ extremes and identities and a return
to the identification with Christ and the scriptures is in order for this age.
Last
and most importantly, we also must accept those among us who hold to such
differences without rushing to divide ourselves or castigating others because
of some difference. If we don't practice this, we will find ourselves doing the
exact same things we are critiquing others of doing: putting our understanding
of Christ at the center of our lives instead of putting Christ Himself there.
All Bible references are taken from the:
New
International Version (NIV)
Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984 by International
Bible Society
back to Articles
back to Home Page